EXP

Section: Mathematical Library (3M)
Updated: August 1, 1992
Index Return to Main Contents
 

NAME

exp, log, log10, pow, expm1, log1p - exponential, logarithm, power  

SYNOPSIS

#include <math.h>

double exp(double x);

double log(double x);

double log10(double x);

double pow(double x, double y);
 

(ALSO AVAILABLE IN BSD)

double expm1(double x);

double log1p(double x);
 

DESCRIPTION

Exp returns the exponential function of x.

Log returns the natural logarithm of x.

Log10 returns the logarithm of x to base 10.

Pow(x,y) returns x**y.

Expm1 returns exp(x)-1 accurately even for tiny x.

Log1p returns log(1+x) accurately even for tiny x.  

ERROR (due to roundoff, etc.)

exp(x), log(x), expm1(x) and log1p(x) are accurate to within an ulp, and log10(x) to within about 2 ulps; an ulp is one Unit in the Last Place. The error in pow(x,y) is below about 2 ulps when its magnitude is moderate, but increases as pow(x,y) approaches the over/underflow thresholds until almost as many bits could be lost as are occupied by the floating-point format's exponent field. No such drastic loss has been exposed by testing. Moderate values of pow are accurate enough that pow(integer,integer) is exact until it is bigger than 2**56 on a VAX, 2**53 for IEEE 754.  

NOTES

The functions exp(x)-1 and log(1+x) are called expm1 and logp1 in BASIC on the Hewlett-Packard HP-71B and APPLE Macintosh, EXP1 and LN1 in Pascal, exp1 and log1 in C on APPLE Macintoshes, where they have been provided to make sure financial calculations of ((1+x)**n-1)/x, namely expm1(n*log1p(x))/x, will be accurate when x is tiny. They also provide accurate inverse hyperbolic functions.

Pow(x,0) returns x**0 = 1 for all x including x = 0, Infinity operand on a VAX). Previous implementations of pow may have defined x**0 to be undefined in some or all of these cases. Here are reasons for returning x**0 = 1 always:

(1)
Any program that already tests whether x is zero (or infinite or NaN) before computing x**0 cannot care whether 0**0 = 1 or not. Any program that depends upon 0**0 to be invalid is dubious anyway since that expression's meaning and, if invalid, its consequences vary from one computer system to another.
(2)
Some Algebra texts (e.g. Sigler's) define x**0 = 1 for all x, including x = 0. This is compatible with the convention that accepts a[0] as the value of polynomial
p(x) = a[0]*x**0 + a[1]*x**1 + a[2]*x**2 +...+ a[n]*x**n
at x = 0 rather than reject a[0]*0**0 as invalid.
(3)
Analysts will accept 0**0 = 1 despite that x**y can approach anything or nothing as x and y approach 0 independently. The reason for setting 0**0 = 1 anyway is this:
If x(z) and y(z) are any functions analytic (expandable in power series) in z around z = 0, and if there x(0) = y(0) = 0, then x(z)**y(z) -> 1 as z -> 0.
(4)
If 0**0 = 1, then infinity**0 = 1/0**0 = 1 too; and then NaN**0 = 1 too because x**0 = 1 for all finite and infinite x, i.e., independently of x.
 

SEE ALSO

math(3M)  

AUTHOR

Kwok-Choi Ng, W. Kahan


 

Index

NAME
SYNOPSIS
(ALSO AVAILABLE IN BSD)
DESCRIPTION
ERROR (due to roundoff, etc.)
NOTES
SEE ALSO
AUTHOR

This document was created by man2html, using the manual pages.
Time: 17:21:01 GMT, March 25, 2025